Link;
http://www.alvinleong.info/sfg/sfgdownrank.html#rank
To understand downranking, we must first understand Halliday's rank scale, as follows:
Clause
|
Word group
|
Word
|
Word group
|
Word
Now, downranking occurs when something from a higher rank functions at a
lower rank. For us, we will be mainly concerned with downranked
clauses. So, if a clause functions as something lower than a clause
(say, a participant or part of a participant), we consider it a
downranked clause. Some examples are:
- Seeing Minnie in a two-piece suit was too much for Mickey.
- What tutorials give me is a massive headache.
- The laksa seller who forgot my order thinks of nothing but cockles.
In (1) and (2), it is quite easy to see downranking at work. The
underlined segments are technically clauses. But because they function
as subjects, they are said to be nominalised and, therefore, downranked.
Sometimes, we encounter stuff like (3). The underlined segment is
traditionally labelled a restrictive (or defining)
relative clause. A restrictive relative clause is downranked because it
is part of the NG. As opposed